Policy Alert: State and Local Disaster Preparedness
Our Privacy Policy has been updated! The Conference Board uses cookies to improve our website, enhance your experience, and deliver relevant messages and offers about our products. Detailed information on the use of cookies on this site is provided in our cookie policy. For more information on how The Conference Board collects and uses personal data, please visit our privacy policy. By continuing to use this Site or by clicking "ACCEPT", you acknowledge our privacy policy and consent to the use of cookies. 

CED Newsletters & Policy Alerts

Timely Public Policy insights for what's ahead

Action: Executive Order “Achieving Efficiency Through State and Local Preparedness

 

What it does: The Order states that “Federal policy must rightly recognize that preparedness is most effectively owned and managed at the State, local, and even individual levels, supported by a competent, accessible, and efficient Federal Government”—a change from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) taking the lead in most disaster response. It seeks to reduce the complexity of disaster response and better meet the citizens’ needs by enabling state and local governments to better understand and prepare for disaster events through streamlining Federal preparedness and response policies.

In another area, risk management, the Order directs National Security Advisor Michael Waltz to launch a National Resilience Strategy “that articulates the priorities, means, and ways to advance the resilience of the Nation” within 90 days. It also establishes a National Risk Register “that identifies, articulates, and quantifies natural and malign risks to our national infrastructure, related systems, and their users” to inform the intelligence community, private sector investments, state investments, and Federal budget priorities.

Key Insights

  • The Order reflects statements from the President about reducing the role of the Federal government in disaster response. Earlier, the President had established a FEMA Agency Council to make recommendations on “revisions, recissions, and replacements necessary to reformulate the process and metrics for Federal responsibility” in disaster preparedness and response.
  • Visiting disaster zones in California and North Carolina in January, the President said that FEMA “has been a very big disappointment” and that he was considering “getting rid of it.”
  • That decision will have to await the report of the Agency Council (and Congress would have to agree). But this Order envisions a continued role for FEMA in some capacity. States and localities would struggle with response to major disasters on their own, stretching state budgets. The Order is designed to reduce costs by increasing preparedness, but many of these costs would also likely be borne by state and local governments, the private sector, and individuals.
  • More than 1,000 FEMA employees have been dismissed since January 20; the agency had already been struggling with personnel shortages. A 2023 report by the US Government Accountability Office found that FEMA in FY 2022 had a 35 percent gap in necessary staffing and a heavy workload of managing rising disaster activity increased burnout and led to retention issues.
  • The Order shifts national critical infrastructure policy from an “all-hazards” approach to a “risk-informed approach, prioritizing resilience and action over mere information sharing.” This could, however, lead to less sharing of information over time for some potential hazards depending on how the new approach is implemented.

 

Policy Alert: State and Local Disaster Preparedness

March 21, 2025

Action: Executive Order “Achieving Efficiency Through State and Local Preparedness

 

What it does: The Order states that “Federal policy must rightly recognize that preparedness is most effectively owned and managed at the State, local, and even individual levels, supported by a competent, accessible, and efficient Federal Government”—a change from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) taking the lead in most disaster response. It seeks to reduce the complexity of disaster response and better meet the citizens’ needs by enabling state and local governments to better understand and prepare for disaster events through streamlining Federal preparedness and response policies.

In another area, risk management, the Order directs National Security Advisor Michael Waltz to launch a National Resilience Strategy “that articulates the priorities, means, and ways to advance the resilience of the Nation” within 90 days. It also establishes a National Risk Register “that identifies, articulates, and quantifies natural and malign risks to our national infrastructure, related systems, and their users” to inform the intelligence community, private sector investments, state investments, and Federal budget priorities.

Key Insights

  • The Order reflects statements from the President about reducing the role of the Federal government in disaster response. Earlier, the President had established a FEMA Agency Council to make recommendations on “revisions, recissions, and replacements necessary to reformulate the process and metrics for Federal responsibility” in disaster preparedness and response.
  • Visiting disaster zones in California and North Carolina in January, the President said that FEMA “has been a very big disappointment” and that he was considering “getting rid of it.”
  • That decision will have to await the report of the Agency Council (and Congress would have to agree). But this Order envisions a continued role for FEMA in some capacity. States and localities would struggle with response to major disasters on their own, stretching state budgets. The Order is designed to reduce costs by increasing preparedness, but many of these costs would also likely be borne by state and local governments, the private sector, and individuals.
  • More than 1,000 FEMA employees have been dismissed since January 20; the agency had already been struggling with personnel shortages. A 2023 report by the US Government Accountability Office found that FEMA in FY 2022 had a 35 percent gap in necessary staffing and a heavy workload of managing rising disaster activity increased burnout and led to retention issues.
  • The Order shifts national critical infrastructure policy from an “all-hazards” approach to a “risk-informed approach, prioritizing resilience and action over mere information sharing.” This could, however, lead to less sharing of information over time for some potential hazards depending on how the new approach is implemented.

 

More From This Series

Newsletters & Alerts
Newsletters & Alerts
Newsletters & Alerts
Newsletters & Alerts