Policy Backgrounders
The Conference Board uses cookies to improve our website, enhance your experience, and deliver relevant messages and offers about our products. Detailed information on the use of cookies on this site is provided in our cookie policy. For more information on how The Conference Board collects and uses personal data, please visit our privacy policy. By continuing to use this Site or by clicking "OK", you consent to the use of cookies. 

Policy Backgrounders

CED’s Policy Backgrounders provide timely insights on prominent business and economic policy issues facing the nation.

U.S. v. Google Decision

August 08, 2024

Trusted Insights for What’s Ahead™

After a long trial featuring many expert witnesses from the tech industry, US District Judge Amit Mehta ruled that “Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly [.]” Google thus violated Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

  • The case will now enter a penalty phase considering a variety of potential remedies. A decision in that phase could take up to several years, limiting the immediate impact on Google.
  • In the meantime, Google faces additional antitrust suits in the US and Europe and the possibility of class-action suits filed in response to the decision.
  • However, the decision also ruled in favor of Google in some key areas.

Author

hubCircleImage