Sustainability Practices: 2018 Edition—Trends in Corporate Sustainability Reporting in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific
December 07, 2018 | Report
Sustainability reporting remains sporadic in countries where both nonfinancial reporting regulations and stakeholder pressures are absent. Even in Europe, where nonfinancial reporting has had a longer history compared to other regions, there are significant differences in levels of transparency across countries. For example, there is as wide a gap in the levels of disclosure between companies in the United Kingdom and Poland as there is between companies in Japan and Pakistan.
The lack of comparable nonfinancial reporting regulations across jurisdictions has in part made sustainability reporting a globally uneven practice. In a few countries, mandatory nonfinancial reporting requirements have led to significant increases in disclosure rates. In the absence of mandated disclosure, in some countries industry-led initiatives and stakeholder pressure have also been major drivers of disclosure.
This 2018 edition of our analysis of trends in corporate sustainability reporting uncovers some of the gaps in nonfinancial disclosure, identifies areas where progress has been made, and highlights key issues that companies should keep on their radars. We analyzed data on sustainability disclosure and performance on 90+ environmental and social practices for more than 5,000 companies in 23 countries, spanning Asia-Pacific, Europe, and North America.
Corporate sustainability reporting—the disclosure of the economic, environmental, and social impacts of a company—has evolved tremendously over the last two decades, growing from a niche practice to one increasingly expected of companies. The mainstreaming of sustainability reporting has been driven, in part, by increased pressure from shareholders and other stakeholders who see value in understanding how a company manages its nonfinancial impacts. This message was made clear by BlackRock CEO Larry Fink in his 2018 letter to company CEOs. Reporting is also being helped along by pointed regulations in various regions. Whether the combination of regulatory requirements and shareholder pressure will improve actual sustainability performance, not just compliance, remains to be seen.
Sustainability reporting is still not a uniform pr
This publication is exclusive to members of The Conference Board.
For information about membership click here.
AUTHORS
- CREATE AN ACCOUNT SIGN IN
-
Only available to members. Become a member.
Charts
Sustainability: Purchase Drivers vs. Disclosure
Comparing the top sustainability attributes that influence consumer purchases with company disclosures on proxies for those attributes
LEARN MORECharts
Adjusted vs. Unadjusted Gender Pay Gap Disclosure: What's the Difference?
Ten percent of S&P 500 companies disclose gender pay gap data, but not all disclosures are the same.
LEARN MORECharts
Toward Renewable Energy
Today, leaders may turn to a greater share of fossil fuels for energy needs. But eventually a transition to renewable energy is likely. Is your company ready?
LEARN MORECharts
Disclosing Scope 3 GHG Emissions
New SEC rules may mean companies must disclose indirect value chain emissions
LEARN MOREPublications
Webcasts, Podcasts and Videos
Upcoming Events
Press Releases / In the News
PRESS RELEASE
Report: Gap in Climate Disclosures Between Large, Small Cos
January 20, 2022
BRIEF
Diversity and Disclosure Drive Shareholders’ Human Capital Management Agenda
October 08, 2021
IN THE NEWS
Thomas Singer: 4 things you should know about sustainability reporting practices
March 02, 2020