Q&A with Amanda MacArthur: Leadership Development with Social Impact
The Conference Board uses cookies to improve our website, enhance your experience, and deliver relevant messages and offers about our products. Detailed information on the use of cookies on this site is provided in our cookie policy. For more information on how The Conference Board collects and uses personal data, please visit our privacy policy. By continuing to use this Site or by clicking "OK", you consent to the use of cookies. 

Corporations operate employee volunteering programs all over the world, but often they are sporadic, limited initiatives. PYXERA Global helps companies send employees on skills-based assignments with nonprofit and government partners, small- to medium-sized businesses, universities, associations, and other institutions in developing countries, giving both the employee valuable experience and the partner organization expertise for critical business issues. PYXERA Global’s VP of Global Pro Bono and Engagement, Amanda MacArthur, answered my questions regarding the benefits such programs bring, and trends the industry is seeing.

Q: What is global pro bono and why do companies encourage their employees to participate in these projects?

A: Global pro bono is a practice in which multinational companies such as IBM, The Dow Chemical Company, and SAP send high-performing employees to work on skills-based, deliverable-driven projects in emerging and frontier markets. One of the main drivers for this is cultivating new talent. Global companies need globally competent employees and this is a great approach to combine that with providing transformative value in emerging markets.

Projects are usually team-based and provide the opportunity for employees to develop their soft skills (i.e., leadership, cross-cultural communication, and resiliency) and the hard skills (i.e., marketing and sales, finance, or technology) that are used in the day-to-day of a pro-bono assignment.

Q: What are the hallmarks of an effective global pro bono partnership between companies and nonprofits?

A: Sending a cross-functional team of employees from disparate geographies worldwide into an emerging economy in Africa, Asia, or Latin America requires partnership, flexibility and a high degree of coordination. The most important thing is to have clear and open lines of communication to ensure that expectations are met and managed. If that’s in place, most other challenges can be surmounted.

Q: Last year’s global pro bono benchmarking research showed that the vast majority of companies pay for programs from their CSR budgets, rather than HR budgets. Why is this? Does it suggest that companies consider global pro bono as more of a CSR tool than an employee engagement tool? Do you expect similar findings in this year’s survey?

A: I do expect similar findings in this year’s benchmarking study, though I think we are starting to see a shift towards HR budgets taking more of the responsibility for paying for these programs. We are starting to get good quantitative evidence of the value of global pro bono as a talent-development tool. For example, in its 2012 GSK PULSE Volunteer Partnership Annual Impact Report, pharmaceutical company GSK reported 92 percent of past participants believe the global pro bono assignment equipped them with the skills to better drive change in their organization. Meanwhile, tech company IBM found that 88 percent of past participants have an increased ability to listen for client needs.

I think once this evidence is more established we’ll see more companies funding programs out of their HR budgets. I also think that many companies still view the emerging markets as part of their CSR strategy and not their business strategy—this is also changing and global pro bono is a great way to increase exposure in these markets.

Q: Another finding from your benchmarking study is that companies tend to take part in global pro bono programs in teams. Can you explain a typical team project and its advantages?

A: Team-based programs are popular for a few reasons (aside from the most obvious of encouraging teamwork). For one, there is an economy of scale, so there is some cost savings. There is also a level of comfort with sending a group of people—they have one another to rely on when the culture shock sets in.

The opportunity for cross-company fertilization is also important, as employees from different parts of a company—either different business units or different locations—have the opportunity to work together. In global companies, an employee often has to work with counterparts in multiple countries to which they may have little or no exposure. Team-based global pro bono projects help participating employees to understand how the company operates globally and how they relate to it as an individual.

Q: How do companies measure the social and business value of global pro bono programs?

A: Much of the social impact measurement still relies on outputs, like the number of people trained or the strategy developed. We are now starting to look more closely at how these become outcomes and improve the ability of the local clients to better fulfil their mission and meet the needs of their stakeholders.

From a business perspective, most companies are still relying on self-reporting from the employee with regards to personal and professional development. However, we’re starting to get information about how these programs impact retention and recruitment. A few companies, including IBM and GSK, are starting to survey direct line managers of returned volunteers to understand the impact of the program on the business unit and we’re starting to get great insight from that.

Q: As more companies invest in global pro bono practices, are new models emerging? Do you have any particular examples of successful projects that you can share?

A: There are a number of new models that are being developed to meet different corporate needs and social goals—from shorter-term engagements for executive-level employees to virtual programs. One company PYXERA Global works with, The Dow Chemical Company launched its Leadership in Action (LIA) program last year in Ghana. LIA is a novel program that joins the company’s Dow Sustainability Corps (DSC) and human resources to offer a unique twist on leadership development.

Through the program, seven teams of Dow employees worked virtually—through conference calls and internet—with a university, social enterprise, or nonprofit to help solve pressing local challenges. At the end of five months of virtual collaboration, the consulting teams travelled to Ghana to spend several days with their local client and hand-off the deliverable. PYXERA Global is now facilitating this “virtual global pro bono” model with eight new Dow teams in Ethiopia, a relatively new market for the company.

 

This blog originally appeared as part of The Conference Board Giving Thoughts series on 7/08/2014.

View our complete listing of Leadership Development blogs.

Q&A with Amanda MacArthur: Leadership Development with Social Impact

Q&A with Amanda MacArthur: Leadership Development with Social Impact

21 Jul. 2014 | Comments (0)

Corporations operate employee volunteering programs all over the world, but often they are sporadic, limited initiatives. PYXERA Global helps companies send employees on skills-based assignments with nonprofit and government partners, small- to medium-sized businesses, universities, associations, and other institutions in developing countries, giving both the employee valuable experience and the partner organization expertise for critical business issues. PYXERA Global’s VP of Global Pro Bono and Engagement, Amanda MacArthur, answered my questions regarding the benefits such programs bring, and trends the industry is seeing.

Q: What is global pro bono and why do companies encourage their employees to participate in these projects?

A: Global pro bono is a practice in which multinational companies such as IBM, The Dow Chemical Company, and SAP send high-performing employees to work on skills-based, deliverable-driven projects in emerging and frontier markets. One of the main drivers for this is cultivating new talent. Global companies need globally competent employees and this is a great approach to combine that with providing transformative value in emerging markets.

Projects are usually team-based and provide the opportunity for employees to develop their soft skills (i.e., leadership, cross-cultural communication, and resiliency) and the hard skills (i.e., marketing and sales, finance, or technology) that are used in the day-to-day of a pro-bono assignment.

Q: What are the hallmarks of an effective global pro bono partnership between companies and nonprofits?

A: Sending a cross-functional team of employees from disparate geographies worldwide into an emerging economy in Africa, Asia, or Latin America requires partnership, flexibility and a high degree of coordination. The most important thing is to have clear and open lines of communication to ensure that expectations are met and managed. If that’s in place, most other challenges can be surmounted.

Q: Last year’s global pro bono benchmarking research showed that the vast majority of companies pay for programs from their CSR budgets, rather than HR budgets. Why is this? Does it suggest that companies consider global pro bono as more of a CSR tool than an employee engagement tool? Do you expect similar findings in this year’s survey?

A: I do expect similar findings in this year’s benchmarking study, though I think we are starting to see a shift towards HR budgets taking more of the responsibility for paying for these programs. We are starting to get good quantitative evidence of the value of global pro bono as a talent-development tool. For example, in its 2012 GSK PULSE Volunteer Partnership Annual Impact Report, pharmaceutical company GSK reported 92 percent of past participants believe the global pro bono assignment equipped them with the skills to better drive change in their organization. Meanwhile, tech company IBM found that 88 percent of past participants have an increased ability to listen for client needs.

I think once this evidence is more established we’ll see more companies funding programs out of their HR budgets. I also think that many companies still view the emerging markets as part of their CSR strategy and not their business strategy—this is also changing and global pro bono is a great way to increase exposure in these markets.

Q: Another finding from your benchmarking study is that companies tend to take part in global pro bono programs in teams. Can you explain a typical team project and its advantages?

A: Team-based programs are popular for a few reasons (aside from the most obvious of encouraging teamwork). For one, there is an economy of scale, so there is some cost savings. There is also a level of comfort with sending a group of people—they have one another to rely on when the culture shock sets in.

The opportunity for cross-company fertilization is also important, as employees from different parts of a company—either different business units or different locations—have the opportunity to work together. In global companies, an employee often has to work with counterparts in multiple countries to which they may have little or no exposure. Team-based global pro bono projects help participating employees to understand how the company operates globally and how they relate to it as an individual.

Q: How do companies measure the social and business value of global pro bono programs?

A: Much of the social impact measurement still relies on outputs, like the number of people trained or the strategy developed. We are now starting to look more closely at how these become outcomes and improve the ability of the local clients to better fulfil their mission and meet the needs of their stakeholders.

From a business perspective, most companies are still relying on self-reporting from the employee with regards to personal and professional development. However, we’re starting to get information about how these programs impact retention and recruitment. A few companies, including IBM and GSK, are starting to survey direct line managers of returned volunteers to understand the impact of the program on the business unit and we’re starting to get great insight from that.

Q: As more companies invest in global pro bono practices, are new models emerging? Do you have any particular examples of successful projects that you can share?

A: There are a number of new models that are being developed to meet different corporate needs and social goals—from shorter-term engagements for executive-level employees to virtual programs. One company PYXERA Global works with, The Dow Chemical Company launched its Leadership in Action (LIA) program last year in Ghana. LIA is a novel program that joins the company’s Dow Sustainability Corps (DSC) and human resources to offer a unique twist on leadership development.

Through the program, seven teams of Dow employees worked virtually—through conference calls and internet—with a university, social enterprise, or nonprofit to help solve pressing local challenges. At the end of five months of virtual collaboration, the consulting teams travelled to Ghana to spend several days with their local client and hand-off the deliverable. PYXERA Global is now facilitating this “virtual global pro bono” model with eight new Dow teams in Ethiopia, a relatively new market for the company.

 

This blog originally appeared as part of The Conference Board Giving Thoughts series on 7/08/2014.

View our complete listing of Leadership Development blogs.

  • About the Author:Alex Parkinson

    Alex Parkinson

    The following is a biography of former employee/consultant Alex Parkinson is Principal of Parky Communications, a communications agency specializing in sustainability and CSR reporting and communicat…

    Full Bio | More from Alex Parkinson

     

0 Comment Comment Policy

Please Sign In to post a comment.