All Briefs
2013
-
CEOs Are Different from Us (and from CFOs)
July 12 | HBR The Daily Stat | Comments (0)Just 9.8% of chief executives can be categorized as highly risk-averse, compared with 64% of the (similarly aged) general population, according to a survey of about 1,000 top leaders in the U.S. by John R. Graham, Campbell R. Harvey, and Manju Puri of Duke University.
-
Rethinking Family-Related Benefit Programs after the Doma Decision
July 09 | Anna M. Rappaport | Comments (0)The U.S. Supreme Court held the federal Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional. This ruling will have many impacts on employee benefits, and extend to same sex married couples the rights of married couples as required by Federal law.
-
Netflix: We Got It Right!
July 08 | Edward E. Lawler III, Distinguished Professor of Business and Director of the Center for Effective Organizations, USC Marshall School of Business | Comments (0)In our 2012 book, Management Reset, Chris Worley and I argue that one key to making the human capital side of organizations more agile is adopting what we call a “travel light” talent management philosophy.
-
Who's Really Responsible for P&G's Succession Problems?
July 02 | Boris Groysberg, Professor of Business Administration, Harvard Business School | Deborah Bell, Researcher of Organizational Behavior | Comments (0)People will continue to debate Procter & Gamble's move to replace CEO Bob McDonald with his immediate predecessor A.G. Lafley, but for us the most compelling and determinative part of this story lies with the board.
-
Who Should Actually Have Say on Pay?
June 28 | Justin Fox, Editorial Director , Harvard Business Review Group | Comments (0)There is evidence that say-on-pay votes have led British companies to make executive paychecks more sensitive to poor performance. Say-on-pay votes do have an impact. The question is, what kind of impact?
-
When Is It a Good Idea to Bring Back Your Old CEO?
June 28 | Ken Favaro, Senior Partner, Booz & Company | Comments (0)In recent weeks both J.C. Penney and Procter & Gamble replaced a sitting CEO with his predecessor. This back-to-the-future approach to succession isn't common — and surely most company boards aren't seeking to make it so
-
Talent Management: Boards Give Their Companies an
June 27 | Boris Groysberg, Professor of Business Administration, Harvard Business School | Comments (0)What is top of mind for corporate boards worldwide? In one of the most comprehensive global surveys of corporate directors to date, we found that they were very worried about developing and enacting strategic plans that will enable their organizations to succeed.
-
What A.G. Lafley's Return Means for P&G
June 26 | Sarah Green Carmichael, Senior Associate Editor, Harvard Business Review | Comments (0)P&G's board has been under a great deal of pressure from an activist investor who has made his views on the pace of the restructuring clear and vocal. Regardless of the merits, that begins to wear everyone down.
-
For Dimon and Board Leaders: Function Matters, Not Form
June 24 | Ben Heineman, Jr., Senior Fellow, Harvard's Law and Kennedy Schools | Comments (0)One of the dumbest corporate governance issues is whether to split the roles of Board Chair and CEO. That debate is now playing out on the front pages of business sections as shareholders will decide next week whether to take the chairman of the board title away from JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon.