-
Email
Linkedin
Facebook
Twitter
Copy Link
Understanding the existing program: The current EB-5 visa program has helped fund huge real estate projects, including New York’s Hudson Yards and The Wharf in Washington, DC, through foreign investment. EB-5 visa holders invest roughly $1 million into job-creating projects as part of their paths to green cards. The existing program raised more than $2 billion in each of the last two years, with the majority of it directed to commercial real estate projects, including office, industrial, and multi-family residential properties. This has been particularly useful during a time of high interest rates and constrained lending. Foreign investors using the EB-5 program are seeking citizenship, not specific returns on investment, which has given latitude to commercial real estate developers. The developer of a 19-story residential tower described how financing through traditional capital markets could come with 10-12% interest rates, compared to only 5-7% with EB-5 investors, cutting the cost of capital significantly. The TCB take: The Administration should make sure replacing the EB-5 program with the “gold card” does not reduce the foreign investment market for real estate financing and that terms are clear. The proposed “gold card” references $5 million being paid as a fee or donation, not as an investment, which would be paid back (as it is with the EB-5 program). Understanding who would receive this fee, and how it would be invested in the US economy has not been detailed. This creates uncertainty for real estate developers seeking foreign investment. As currently described, the “gold card” program could shrink the pool of investors, due to bringing up the cost-of-entry to $5 million from about $1 million with the EB-5 program.Replacing EB-5 Visas with “Gold Cards” Could Leave Hole in Commercial Real Estate Market
The President recently announced a plan for a “gold card” visa program to provide permanent residency and a “path to citizenship” that would cost $5 million and replace the EB-5 program. Although the Administration doesn’t have that authority without authorization from Congress, the potential elimination of the EB-5 program has many in commercial real estate concerned.
Members of The Conference Board get exclusive access to Trusted Insights for What’s Ahead® through publications, Conferences and events, webcasts, podcasts, data & analysis, and Member Communities.
Cutting Discretionary Spending to Offset Higher Prices
March 28, 2025
Auto Makers Hit a Tariff Speedbump
March 27, 2025
Administration acts with Congress to reverse methane fee
March 25, 2025
Fed Keeps Cutting Bias amid “Transitory” Tariff Inflation
March 19, 2025
Retail Sales Show Consumers Are More Frugal amid Uncertainty
March 17, 2025
The EU's Retaliatory Tariffs Will Hit Beef, Bourbon and More
March 14, 2025
Charts
The proliferation of easy-to-use generative AI requires that policymakers and business leaders each play an important role.
LEARN MORECharts
A hyperpolarized environment, diminished trust in our nation’s leaders.
LEARN MOREIN THE NEWS
Steve Odland: Tariffs to cost U.S. manufacturers $144 billion annually
February 03, 2025
PRESS RELEASE
CED Maps Out 2025 Policy Plan for New President and Congress
January 23, 2025
IN THE NEWS
If the election is contested again in November, will corporate leaders push…
October 21, 2024
Commentary and Letters
The Biggest Problem Trump and Harris Aren’t Talking About
October 15, 2024
Commentary and Letters
Letter to Presidential Candidates Regarding US Fiscal Health
October 04, 2024
IN THE NEWS
Public & private sectors must prepare for AI-powered election attacks
October 31, 2023