Manufacturing: If Not China, Then Where?
The Conference Board uses cookies to improve our website, enhance your experience, and deliver relevant messages and offers about our products. Detailed information on the use of cookies on this site is provided in our cookie policy. For more information on how The Conference Board collects and uses personal data, please visit our privacy policy. By continuing to use this Site or by clicking "OK", you consent to the use of cookies. 

Geopolitics Hub

Navigating the Rapidly Changing World Order

Subscribe

Manufacturing: If Not China, Then Where?


June 01, 2022 | Report

If companies wanted to diversify their production facilities away from China, where would they go?

Potential destinations for relocating or expanding manufacturing capacity emerge when we look at our newly developed Global Supplier Index (GSI).1 While China cannot be easily replaced as a manufacturing hub, rising wages in China, high transport costs, and the Chinese government’s Zero-COVID-19 strategy are forcing firms to consider other regions for production. Our research suggests that North America (and Central America by proximity) and certain other Asian economies may be optimal alternative locations. Globally, some economies can easily support a new expansion of their manufacturing capacity because of low labor costs and geography. Others will benefit from reshuffling of supply chains because their industrial bases can support new industries with the required intermediate inputs.

As firms diversify their supply chains, they must be strategic and targeted and not seek one-size-fits-all solutions.2

Insights for What’s Ahead

  • Geopolitics should be a deliberate consideration in decisions to locate manufacturing plants, along with labor costs, existing supplier bases for available inputs, and other structural factors such as labor shortages, particularly for the US and European economies.
  • North America (the US, Canada, and Mexico) has a sizable supplier base capable of supporting more manufacturing activity than it currently does. But not everything can and will be reshored because comparative advantage is not just about a supplier base. Labor costs are still critical for deciding where to locate manufacturing, as are other institutional characteristics of an economy, including ease of doing business and property rights. Given high labor costs, high taxes, and regulation in the United States and Canada, Mexico and Central American economies could be beneficiaries.
  • Given new disruptions to commodities markets (e.g., metals and food) associated with the war in Ukraine and weather events, new opportunities could develop for upstream suppliers in Australia and Brazil, even though they too are being negatively affected by shifts in global supply.
  • Companies now recognize that shifting to regional and domestic suppliers, and diversifying supply sources away from China, should be strongly considered. China’s Zero-COVID-19 strategy and ongoing large-scale shutdowns could accelerate this shift. These China-specific pressures, as well as pressures from governments looking to make supply chains more resilient and higher transport costs (e.g., fuel, shipping containers, warehousing, etc.), will lead to either duplication of supply chains in the broader Asia region or moving closer to other regional manufacturing hubs.


[1] See Appendix. This article looks at production location decisions in light of new research using newly developed input-output data sets. See also Introduction to The Conference Board Global Supplier Index, November 2021; World Input Output Database; and Asian Development Bank’s Multiregional Input-Output Database.

[2] For example, for some industries, the reasons to relocate production supply chains and diversify away from China are exacerbated by the global pandemic and the war in Ukraine. There are four new factors: 1) long-run trends toward reshoring are accelerating worldwide (preferences, policy, and labor costs are incentives to reshore), 2) the Zero-COVID-19 policy in China, demonstrated by the shutdown of major productions hubs including Shanghai, makes China less than ideal as a production location because of potential for frequent disruptions, 3) if China explicitly sides with Russia in the conflict, this will likely result in highly disruptive sanctions, and 4) some argue the likelihood of a new conflict with Taiwan has increased significantly, which could also result in sanctions and disruptions, especially in supply chains involving semiconductors.


AUTHORS

AtamanOzyildirim

Former Senior Director, Economics
The Conference Board

Dana M.Peterson

Chief Economist and Leader, Economy, Strategy & Finance Center
The Conference Board


Explore More on this Topic

Filter By Center


Publications


Webcasts, Podcasts and Videos


Press Releases / In the News

hubCircleImage