First 2022 Racial Equity Audit Proposals Successful
The Conference Board uses cookies to improve our website, enhance your experience, and deliver relevant messages and offers about our products. Detailed information on the use of cookies on this site is provided in our cookie policy. For more information on how The Conference Board collects and uses personal data, please visit our privacy policy. By continuing to use this Site or by clicking "OK", you consent to the use of cookies. 

In our recent 2022 Proxy Season Preview report, we flagged shareholder proposals on racial equity / civil rights audits as ones that might move into the “red zone” of a high likelihood of going to a shareholder vote and rising support from shareholders at an annual meeting. Even though wording may vary, these proposals typically request an independent audit of companies’ practices related to racial equity and/or civil rights to address racial or civil injustice.

Our prediction seems to be bearing out: of all environmental and social (E&S) proposals that have appeared on proxy ballots thus far, eight focus on the racial equity / civil rights audit – which is more than most other E&S topics. What’s more, the first of such proposals that were voted on passed at Apple and MAXIMUS earlier this month.

Investors and proxy advisors increasingly see these audits as a way to gauge the success of the company’s DEI practices. State Street Global Advisors and ISS both codified their approach to the topic, and other investors – such as New York State Common Retirement Funds and Trillium Asset Management – announced the submission of shareholder proposals requesting an independent audit of companies’ practices related to racial equity.

But be alert to another variant of these proposals. The National Center for Public Policy Research, a conservative group, has submitted proposals with similar resolved clauses, but different motives in the supporting statements. They argue, among other things, that “anti-racist” programs themselves are deeply racist and otherwise discriminatory and reference anti-critical race theory publications. The first of such proposals will be voted next month at Bank of America, Citigroup, and Johnson & Johnson. So when evaluating the success of shareholder proposals on racial equity/civil rights audits, be sure not to conflate the two.

If you’d like to stay informed on the 2022 proxy season in real-time, I encourage you to sign up for a demo of the ESG Advantage Shareholder Voting Screening Tool. It lets you generate customized reports on shareholder and management proposals based on topic, proponent, outcome, and company from 2018 through the current proxy season in the full Russell 3000. Best of all, with a single click, you can see the text of the proposal and the vote results — no need to navigate multiple filings or databases.

First 2022 Racial Equity Audit Proposals Successful

First 2022 Racial Equity Audit Proposals Successful

22 Mar. 2022 | Comments (0)

In our recent 2022 Proxy Season Preview report, we flagged shareholder proposals on racial equity / civil rights audits as ones that might move into the “red zone” of a high likelihood of going to a shareholder vote and rising support from shareholders at an annual meeting. Even though wording may vary, these proposals typically request an independent audit of companies’ practices related to racial equity and/or civil rights to address racial or civil injustice.

Our prediction seems to be bearing out: of all environmental and social (E&S) proposals that have appeared on proxy ballots thus far, eight focus on the racial equity / civil rights audit – which is more than most other E&S topics. What’s more, the first of such proposals that were voted on passed at Apple and MAXIMUS earlier this month.

Investors and proxy advisors increasingly see these audits as a way to gauge the success of the company’s DEI practices. State Street Global Advisors and ISS both codified their approach to the topic, and other investors – such as New York State Common Retirement Funds and Trillium Asset Management – announced the submission of shareholder proposals requesting an independent audit of companies’ practices related to racial equity.

But be alert to another variant of these proposals. The National Center for Public Policy Research, a conservative group, has submitted proposals with similar resolved clauses, but different motives in the supporting statements. They argue, among other things, that “anti-racist” programs themselves are deeply racist and otherwise discriminatory and reference anti-critical race theory publications. The first of such proposals will be voted next month at Bank of America, Citigroup, and Johnson & Johnson. So when evaluating the success of shareholder proposals on racial equity/civil rights audits, be sure not to conflate the two.

If you’d like to stay informed on the 2022 proxy season in real-time, I encourage you to sign up for a demo of the ESG Advantage Shareholder Voting Screening Tool. It lets you generate customized reports on shareholder and management proposals based on topic, proponent, outcome, and company from 2018 through the current proxy season in the full Russell 3000. Best of all, with a single click, you can see the text of the proposal and the vote results — no need to navigate multiple filings or databases.

  • About the Author:Merel Spierings

    Merel Spierings

    Merel Spierings is a Senior Researcher for the ESG Center where she writes publications on corporate governance and related ESG topics, including benchmarking reports, thematic pieces stemming fr…

    Full Bio | More from Merel Spierings

     

0 Comment Comment Policy

Please Sign In to post a comment.

    hubCircleImage