Members of The Conference Board get exclusive access to the full range of products and services that deliver Trusted Insights for What's Ahead TM including webcasts, publications, data and analysis, plus discounts to conferences and events.
24 May 2023 / Quick Take
According to a survey of 125 firms by The Conference Board, only about half of companies have experienced backlash related to their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategies—and it has generally been mild in intensity. However, 43 percent of executives surveyed expect backlash to increase.
Despite the negative connotations, ESG backlash can be a clarifying moment for companies. It can prompt companies to reevaluate their ESG strategy, priorities, and commitments. This requires companies to engage the board and senior management in a candid discussion of whether the company is still “in” on ESG and multi-stakeholder capitalism and, if so, in what ways.
The focus of those discussions should be a fact-based evaluation of which ESG issues can contribute significantly to the long-term performance of the company and welfare of the company’s investors, other stakeholders, society at large, and the natural environment. When pulling back on ESG and sustainability investments due to economic or business considerations, it is important to clearly communicate the rationale behind such a move. Otherwise, reduced commitment to ESG may be interpreted as caving into backlash.
According to a survey of 125 firms by The Conference Board, only about half of companies have experienced backlash related to their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategies—and it has generally been mild in intensity. However, 43 percent of executives surveyed expect backlash to increase.
Despite the negative connotations, ESG backlash can be a clarifying moment for companies. It can prompt companies to reevaluate their ESG strategy, priorities, and commitments. This requires companies to engage the board and senior management in a candid discussion of whether the company is still “in” on ESG and multi-stakeholder capitalism and, if so, in what ways.
The focus of those discussions should be a fact-based evaluation of which ESG issues can contribute significantly to the long-term performance of the company and welfare of the company’s investors, other stakeholders, society at large, and the natural environment. When pulling back on ESG and sustainability investments due to economic or business considerations, it is important to clearly communicate the rationale behind such a move. Otherwise, reduced commitment to ESG may be interpreted as caving into backlash.
Members of The Conference Board get exclusive access to Trusted Insights for What’s AheadTM through publications, Conferences and events, webcasts, podcasts, data & analysis, and Member Communities.
You already have an account with The Conference Board.
Please try to login in with your email or click here if you have forgotten your password.