Policy Backgrounders
The Conference Board uses cookies to improve our website, enhance your experience, and deliver relevant messages and offers about our products. Detailed information on the use of cookies on this site is provided in our cookie policy. For more information on how The Conference Board collects and uses personal data, please visit our privacy policy. By continuing to use this Site or by clicking "OK", you consent to the use of cookies. 

Policy Backgrounders

CED’s Policy Backgrounders provide timely insights on prominent business and economic policy issues facing the nation.

Alternative Methods of Electing the President

October 18, 2024

Key Insights

The US’ method of electing the President—through 51 separate elections to award electoral votes that determine the winner—is unique. While the possibility of change in the system is remote, alternative methods have been proposed; some of them would have delivered similar results in the actual election while providing a greater sense for many Americans that their votes actually count, which would likely drive turnout.

  • In several recent elections, notably 2000 and 2016, the winner has not won the popular vote; in 2016, the margin was nearly 3,000,000 votes higher for the losing candidate.
  • Because of the high bar for amending the US Constitution, it is extremely unlikely that the Electoral College would be abolished.
  • The Constitution gives states the right to choose the manner of selecting their electors; they could switch to systems, for instance, awarding electors to the winners of each Congressional district in a state or awarding electors proportionately by the popular vote in the state.
  • Generally, these alternative systems would have produced the same actual winner, but considerably closer elections, with greater uncertainty about the outcome in advance as more areas of the country could influence the outcome.

Authors

hubCircleImage