Members of The Conference Board get exclusive access to the full range of products and services that deliver Trusted Insights for What's Ahead ® including webcasts, publications, data and analysis, plus discounts to conferences and events.
29 May 2025 | Press Release
Significant policy changes are reshaping how many companies approach sustainability, according to a new survey by The Conference Board.
80% of surveyed sustainability executives say their companies are adjusting their ESG strategies in response to the new administration. The most common change is reframing communications: 52% of executives report reworking their sustainability messaging, including moving away from the term “ESG.”
Tariffs also pose a challenge, with 66% saying they will hinder progress on achieving sustainability goals. Almost half (45%) say they will delay investments in sustainable operations.
The study also captures how ESG backlash is evolving: 90% believe it will persist—or even intensify—over the next few years. That’s a rise from 63% just two years ago. The top targets of backlash are climate-related commitments, such as net-zero goals, and ESG-related language.
When asked who is driving the backlash, surveyed executives now point to federal policymakers. It marks a shift from two years ago, when activists and advocacy groups topped the list.
“Recent policy shifts have turned up the heat on ESG, which had already been facing mounting scrutiny. In most cases, the backlash hasn’t made companies back down, but rather pushed them to recalibrate how they approach, communicate, and integrate these issues into their businesses,” said Andrew Jones, author of the report and Principal Researcher at The Conference Board.
Findings are based on a survey of 125 sustainability executives from large US and multinational companies, conducted between March and April 2025.
The biggest backlash targets in 2025: ESG language and climate goals.
Tariff turbulence is putting new pressure on corporate sustainability strategies.
Companies are adjusting their strategies by reframing language and moving away from the term “ESG.”
Activists take a backseat. Federal policymakers are now the leading source of ESG opposition.
Regulatory fragmentation is now the top challenge for corporate sustainability efforts.
Corporate leaders brace for a prolonged anti-ESG wave.
“Corporate ESG strategies are shifting into a more fragmented, risk-oriented phase. Global regulators and several US states are advancing new standards, even as federal action slows and internal corporate momentum stabilizes. Corporate leaders must manage diverging and often conflicting sustainability expectations from employees, consumers, investors, and regulators with greater precision and pragmatism,” said Jeff Hoffman, Interim Governance & Sustainability Center Leader at The Conference Board.