An Unpredictable Future for Human Capital Management Shareholder Proposals
The Conference Board uses cookies to improve our website, enhance your experience, and deliver relevant messages and offers about our products. Detailed information on the use of cookies on this site is provided in our cookie policy. For more information on how The Conference Board collects and uses personal data, please visit our privacy policy. By continuing to use this Site or by clicking "OK", you consent to the use of cookies. 

An Unpredictable Future for Human Capital Management Shareholder Proposals

/ Quick Take

As in 2022, companies and shareholders this proxy season were often able to reach a compromise on shareholder proposals on human capital management (HCM), avoiding votes on topics such as workplace diversity, pay equity, and EEO-1 data disclosure. By contrast, shareholder proposals on governance and various environmental and social topics were far more likely to go to a vote at annual meetings. HCM proposals that did go to a shareholder vote in 2023 generally received far less support than in 2022. 

Insight for What’s Ahead: The future landscape for other HCM proposals is likely to remain unsettled. While average support for HCM shareholder proposals declined from 28% in 2022 to 20% in 2023, this category was more successful than environmental and social proposals in terms of receiving majority support: five HCM proposals passed, compared to one environmental and one social proposal. In addition, companies should expect an increase in shareholder proposals on diversity and other hot-button topics that are a growing focus of anti-ESG groups and may become even more contentious as we head into a federal election year.

As the decline in support for shareholder proposals on racial equity and/or civil rights audit indicates, investors are willing to listen to what the company is already doing to address the issue, including the cost-benefit analysis of such proposals. 

Our latest reportfeaturing data from analytics firm ESGAUGE and produced with the support of Russell Reynolds Associates and the Rutgers Center for Corporate Law and Governanceprovides further guidance on how companies can prepare for the 2024 proxy season.

As in 2022, companies and shareholders this proxy season were often able to reach a compromise on shareholder proposals on human capital management (HCM), avoiding votes on topics such as workplace diversity, pay equity, and EEO-1 data disclosure. By contrast, shareholder proposals on governance and various environmental and social topics were far more likely to go to a vote at annual meetings. HCM proposals that did go to a shareholder vote in 2023 generally received far less support than in 2022. 

Insight for What’s Ahead: The future landscape for other HCM proposals is likely to remain unsettled. While average support for HCM shareholder proposals declined from 28% in 2022 to 20% in 2023, this category was more successful than environmental and social proposals in terms of receiving majority support: five HCM proposals passed, compared to one environmental and one social proposal. In addition, companies should expect an increase in shareholder proposals on diversity and other hot-button topics that are a growing focus of anti-ESG groups and may become even more contentious as we head into a federal election year.

As the decline in support for shareholder proposals on racial equity and/or civil rights audit indicates, investors are willing to listen to what the company is already doing to address the issue, including the cost-benefit analysis of such proposals. 

Our latest reportfeaturing data from analytics firm ESGAUGE and produced with the support of Russell Reynolds Associates and the Rutgers Center for Corporate Law and Governanceprovides further guidance on how companies can prepare for the 2024 proxy season.

Author

Other Related Resources

hubCircleImage